They are countries with a less unequal distributive structure (for Latin American parameters), which dates back decades to the second half of tth century ., but whose process has installed high expectations of egalitarianism and social mobility and, as mobile phone number list a corollary, a high sensitivity to inequality. In turn, this tradition is associated with a bias towards class self-identification concentrated in the middle classes (% of the people surveyed perceive themselves to be between the fourth and seventh rung of the social scale, mobile phone number list against a regional average of % ).

Finally, the relative institutional stability in these countries since the democratic transitions has allowed conflicts for equality to be processed with "democracy in the streets", that is, with protests and other collective actions, but always ultimately mobile phone number list settled by electoral means. , while in other models this changes. The second is the reactive versus inequality model . The typical case would be, now, Chile. This model combines a more unequal mobile phone number list social structure than the previous one (as we pointed out,

a Gini index above the regional average throughout mobile phone number list the st century ) with a high perception of inequality (in , it is the second country with the highest perception of inequality , only behind Brazil) and a deep social conflict around the issue (in Chile is by far the country with the highest adherence to the statement “Income should be more equal” agains in Argentina, in Peru).